Panorama: Above All Else is a fantasy RPG that gets it's inspirations in play from artwork, which creates a vibrant world in which envoys and spies travel across the world to make gains for the factions to which they are loyal. As these characters galavant about, we learn their place in the world and what's important to them… and what they're willing to do attain their desires. All this as the world grows in detail about them.

One of the participants of the game (often the GM, but this is not necessarily the case) may create a set of art to work from for the world. In doing so, this participant will have a strong influence on the content of the game, especially in terms of what they do NOT include. Pinterest and such sites are of great utility should one decide to create such a set.

If nobody does this, then the set of art in use is essentially everything available on the internet. This can lead to a lot of disconnected elements entering play, but some groups may enjoy this approach.

Participants (including the GM) begin play with 100 Character Points, which are used to imbue characters with traits as detailed below.

A player should be indicated as being the record-keeper, and that player should make notes on the things established. If possible a wiki is an optimal way to keep such notes (or other inter-linked medium). This player should probably NOT be the GM if at all possible.

The first mandatory step of play should be the participants (GM included) perusing the set of art to get a feel for what's available. This should be done prior to the first session of play. Each participant should select three pieces of art that they feel capture something that they would like to somehow be central to play, and have links to them available when the first session starts (or printouts, if preferred).

These images are referred to as Seed Images, and players who bring them are said to have control of the meaning of the images, at least to start. Once everybody has gathered, each participant should look carefully at all of the seed images presented by all of the other participants. In the unlikely event that two participants bring the same image, they both have control of that image, and must agree to all answers (until and unless an Expert Character is created to take control).

The participants establish an order of play by any means they like (simple clockwise player order around a table, typically), and then select somebody to begin. That individual selects a seed image they find interesting, and comes up with a question to ask the controlling participant, something regarding the image. These questions should reveal interesting and play-oriented details about the pictures. The participant in control must answer the question, but they can ask for suggestions from participants who did NOT ask the question, if they don't feel that they have a good answer at present. Participants should not give suggestions unless asked, though they can indicate that they have what they think is a good suggestion (again, the asking player should not be involved in this process at all). In the end, the answer given is selected by the participant in control.

It may occur that nobody has a good idea for an answer to the question asked. In this case, the answering participant must decide if the question was an interesting one or not. If it was, then the answer to the question may be termed a “Mystery” and left unknown, if that's at all plausible. Otherwise the player who asked the question may be required to ask a different question. This continues until a question is asked, and answered.

Good questions will not only resolve issues regarding the images in question, but also to similar images that may be in the art set (especially if the player thinks they might introduce such images later in play). So if there are lots of orcs in the set, and a player has a picture of an orc village, a good question might be about the origin or nature of orcs in general. Other good questions will answer questions about the nature of play of the game, such as how the PCs get around the world of play, or what sorts of dangers typically await them.

Once there is an answered question, play rotates to the next participant in the order, who must ask a question, per Step 2 above.

No more than two questions may be asked about any Seed Image during this phase. This means that eventually there will be exactly six rounds of questions asked. Once these rounds are complete, Phase 1 is complete, and play should move on to Phase 2: Situation Creation.

A player may interrupt play at any time to create a character.

The player should present an image of the character in question. The player must make their selection of this image before they opt to take the character creation action so they do not delay play, presenting the picture at the moment of creation (do not say you're creating a character and go out looking for an image for the character). The player may name the character at this time, but this is not mandatory.

Intrinsic to creating a character is imbuing them with at least one trait with a trait score purchased from the Character Points on a one for one basis. So if a player wishes to give a character a “Strong” trait, they might spend 10 points to make give the character “Strong 10” (which is considerably strong, but not amazingly noteworthy).

Creating a character gives the creating player control over that character (and thus answers all questions about that character). This control is sealed by spending character points on the character, making control irrevocable. A player may not create a character who is an expert on your character, in other words.

A character is an “Expert” in any field of knowledge that they have a trait for, so long as there are no other characters who have a higher rating with with that trait. This essentially gives the player who controls the character control over any images for which the GM rules this character is the Expert. The GM will rule that only one character is the Expert for every image for which a question comes up (and thus give that player control over the answers).

Once you've created a character, you can add additional traits with character points to them at any time, in exactly the same manner as the initial trait. You may also increase the number of points in an existing trait, thus “revealing” that the trait was more potent than we were initially lead to believe.

The GM may never introduce a trait with a rating higher than 50, or increase a trait above that for a character. Note that GM's may create monsters and such with higher traits as obstacles for characters, but the notion is to allow for players to have characters who are the “best” at human scale activities of particular sorts, if they so wish. Thus no human character will have a “big” trait that makes them larger than a dragon; but they may have a Swordsmanship trait that's higher than any other human has.

Players may elect to do this during the seeding phase because in doing so the character may well be an Expert on a subject that pertains to one of the seed images, which will give the player who controls the character control over the answers to questions about said image. That said, obviously another player can create a character who is more of an expert at any time to take control back. Also note that a player can only have one character be their “Player Character” and that you may not end up with the character you've created for this purpose as your PC (see below).

A player may, at any time, interrupt play in order to propose adoption of a character as a “Player Character.” A player character is one that the player will control in terms of actions during scene play (all other characters actions are directed by the GM). The player should then make their case for why they want to play the character, if they so desire. Once a player proposes a character as their PC and makes their pitch, all participants (all players and the GM, as well as official audience members) vote on whether or not the player should get to play the character in question. In the case of a tie, the GM casts the deciding vote.

A player may do this again later in play if they want to switch characters, and the same process is used. If this happens, the previous character reverts to being a GM character.

The GM, as controller of all non-player characters, may not perform this action.

Consider early adoption of PCs carefully, as it's often better to see how the situation of play evolves so as to have a PC whose interaction with the situation in question is enjoyable. On the other hand, if you have your PC early, you may be able to maneuver the situation into something that works for the PC; so it's not a terrible choice. Just keep your PC in mind during situation creation if you create them before that occurs.

The GM is no longer limited in number of character points (but is still limited to no more than 50 points in any trait).

GM sets up scenes. During scenes characters may have conflicts…

Characters accumulate action point totals by invoking traits. Side with the most trait points at the end of bidding wins the conflict. Which traits are usable is up to the GM, based on player description of their character's actions.

A player may add an element to play at any time by presenting an image (in much the same way as they present a character image when creating that image) of something that one of the characters in a scene sees, or to which they are close. They must then select a player to ask them a question about the image, which they must answer (or call a mystery if appropriate). If they cannot do this, then the element is not introduced into play.

Every trait actually has two ratings. If the trait is listed with one rating, the character has a “Reputation” with that trait equal to the trait level. But in some circumstances, the character may have less reputation with the trait; this perhaps most commonly occurs by the character traveling to new places, but there are many ways it can happen. Also under certain other circumstances a player may have a higher reputation for a trait than the actual trait. If the reputation for a trait is other than the actual level of the trait, then the trait should be listed with the reputation following a slash after the actual rating. For instance, if a character has Strong 30, but is thought to be Strong 60, then they would list the trait as “Strong 30/60.”

Reputation can often be used to defuse conflicts, by threatening to bring traits to bear. When this occurs, the conflict to decide if the conflict is avoided is performed as normal, but the character uses their reputation instead of the actual trait. Sometimes it's better to be feared than actually be good.

Note that if a character hasn't established their identity, then they can't claim the benefits of their reputation, of course. It may take a demonstration of some trait in some cases for a character to establish their identity, if they are known for having a particularly high level of a trait.

The most common way to gain reputation with a trait (when the reputation is below the actual level of the trait) is to accomplish a feat using that trait in a way observable by witnesses. The level the reputation increases to depends on the nature of the witnesses. If they are unreliable, it's possible that no reputation will be gained at all.

If they are reliable, but have no traits related to the feat or understanding how it was accomplished, then the level will increase to one higher than the level revealed by the opposition. Note that this may well increase their reputation higher than their actual trait, unless the character makes a successful effort to convince the witness that they are not that good. In that case, the player can select whatever level of reputation they like for the trait in question (often the actual level).

Obviously having a reputation for having a trait that's higher than you actually have may be an asset at first… until somebody makes you prove it. Being found out as having a trait that's not as high as your reputation will tend to get you a reputation as a Braggart by the level of the difference between the reputation and the actual trait bid in a conflict to prove it. Or by the entire level of the reputation if the character does not accept a challenge to prove the level. The character's level of Braggart is subtracted from all of their other reputations for purposes of conflicts of reputation.

If there is a character who has a trait level higher than ten less than the final amount bid by the character, then that amount will be the amount the reputation goes up by.

Players may, of course, later reveal a higher level of a trait for the character (whether established previously or not), which may result in the reputation going up further (this is known as the “I am not left handed” rule).

When entering a new area, where the character is unknown, most of their reputations will effectively be zero, until they have gained reputation per the above process. If necessary, this can be noted by a third notation after another slash after the character's “Global Reputation” (which, after all, doesn't go down just because the local yokels haven't heard of the character).

Another way to lose reputation in a trait is to lose a conflict to somebody with a lower level of that trait with a reputable, but unskilled witness to view the proceedings. Similar to gaining rep above, the level of the trait's reputation is lowered to one less than the level of the trait of the character who defeated your character. Possibly less if the defeat seemed somehow particularly ignominious.

This can even happen with a skilled observer, if the character doesn't reveal their full level of ability in a conflict. Though if the observer is particularly skilled, they may observe the fact that the character is “holding back” at which point the reputation becomes somewhat in question… but the reportable level is what's used in any reputation conflicts until such time as a higher level is pinpointed.